2010/2/16 Terence Parr <[email protected]> > The key to your question was: > > "and it occurred to me that ANTLR does not really inspect follow set, it > seems to inspect only what's left in the rule itself." > > That improvement/bug is what I intend to fix :) Actually, ANTLR v4 lexers > will just plain work better (i.e., more like what you expect) ;) > > Well, yes, right, that would be really nice (by the way, when is this new release coming?), but when I am thinking of this; it would not really save the day in my case as follow set of LineSequence is actually { '}' , ']' } and what I need is loop escaping dependent on previous match, so some constrained context passing would be nice.
> Ter > On Feb 16, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Marcin Rzeźnicki wrote: > > > Hi, > > Thanks for quick reply. > > Anyway, I am not sure whether I understand this RFI you wrote, but if I > do then what I am suggesting is way simpler to implement because the "next > token analysis" part is left to the user. I am not sure whether I see all > the issues clearly. > > > > 2010/2/16 Terence Parr <[email protected]> > > http://www.antlr.org/jira/browse/ANTLR-189 > > Ter > > On Feb 16, 2010, at 10:29 AM, Marcin Rzeźnicki wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Greetings > > Marcin Rzeźnicki > > -- Pozdrawiam Marcin Rzeźnicki List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
