Hi, My only concern is Java ME (BlackBerry et al), Java ME doesn't support generics so I had to port the runtime and strip off generics (and some other things like some containers), not at a lot of work at the moment but if used more heavily in the future then maybe it will be too troublesome to port it to Java ME
Ideally it would be optional :-) Just my $0.02 Thank you and kind regards, Anders Anders Karlsson | Staff SE II | Sybase Inc, Singapore, ( +65 6571 3125 | * [email protected] -- The competent programmer is fully aware of the strictly limited size of his own skull; therefore he approaches the programming task in full humility, and among other things he avoids clever tricks like the plague. -- E.W. Dijkstra Terence Parr <[email protected] du> To Sent by: "[email protected] interest" <antlr-interest-b <[email protected]> [email protected]> cc Subject 07/22/2010 01:30 [antlr-interest] using generics in AM next version of v3 Hi, I'm finding it hard to avoid using generics when updating the runtime for the upcoming v3.3. In principle, we can generate byte codes are compatible with all previous VMs. Is it okay if I start using generics in the runtime? v4, also in development, uses them for sure. Ter List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
