I believe its completely reasonable that new versions should use features present in current versions of the language. Generics are old already, and add good value to the code, so my vote is go ahead.
If someone needs to run antlr in older versions of the runtime, they can use 3.2, its not going away... On 21/7/2010 14:30, Terence Parr wrote: > Hi, > > I'm finding it hard to avoid using generics when updating the runtime for > the upcoming v3.3. In principle, we can generate byte codes are compatible > with all previous VMs. Is it okay if I start using generics in the runtime? > v4, also in development, uses them for sure. > > Ter > > List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest > Unsubscribe: > http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
