On Mar 31, 2012, at 12:50 , Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: > Hi Steph, Greg and others, > > This is very very helpful... > > We are currently working towards our first incubating release, and the > comments/results opened up in Gregg's reports will certainly be taken into > consideration in the next development drive. It would be really great, once > we get working directly on these issues, to liaise with those familiar with > the working draft to ensure as close to 100% PASS performance as possible. So > please keep in touch and feel free to chime in whenever you see fit. Your > involvement is very much valued. > > Thanks again for passing this on. > > Lewis
Lewis, great! do you think it would be possible for you to provide us with a report (eg, an EARL report) of your test results, so that we could include it into http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/ Formally, we have to make an implementation report before issuing a final recommendation; this should happen at the end of April. Although we have already the minimally required number of implementations to pass the last hurdle for standardization, the more the merrier:-) Cheers Ivan > > N.B. Please note that the official Apache Any23 homepage and associated > documentation is now hosted over at incubator.apache.org/any23, here you will > be able to find the most up-to-date documentation on the project. > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Stéphane Corlosquet <[email protected]> > wrote: > Hi Any23 devs, > > The RDFa 1.1 spec is currently in the Candidate Rec period and a test suite > is available at http://rdfa.info/test-suite/. Gregg Kellog tested any23 > with this test suite, and I thought his results should be relevant to you. > > Worth noting is a new RDFa library (cli-rdfa) which passes all RDFa 1.1 > tests [5]. > > Steph. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Gregg Kellogg <[email protected]> > Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 4:50 PM > Subject: any23 RDFa test suite results > To: public-rdfa-wg WG <[email protected]> > > > I did a recent update and added any23 [1] to the processor list of the RDFa > Test Suite. As any23 is widely used, and was, in fact, used for the recent > Web Data Commons structured data extraction [1]. This result is of great > benefit to the structured data community. As they report, they used any23 > for extracting data from the pages. Therefore, I thought it would be useful > to see how any23 actually performs in extracting RDFa. > > I ran the RDFa Test Suite using both RDFa XHTML+RDFa 1.0 [3] and XHTML+RDFa > 1.1 [4] . > > For XHTML+RDFa 1.0, any23 passes 97 out of 117 (82%) of the tests . > For XHTML+RDFa 1.1, any23 passes 89 out of 163 (55%) of the tests. > > An easier way for the any23 group to go, that would likely also result in > improved performance, would be to use Niklas' Clojure implementation [5], > which also runs in the Java VM. > > Gregg > > [1] http://any23.org/ > [2] http://webdatacommons.org/ > [3] http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/any23-rdfa1.0-xhtml1.html > [4] http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/any23-rdfa1.1-xhtml1.html > [5] https://github.com/niklasl/clj-rdfa > > > > -- > Lewis > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
