Hello! On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Stéphane Corlosquet <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Nick, > > Yes, I'm touch with the author (Niklas), I've pinged him and asked him to > follow up here. > > Steph. > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Nick Kew <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On 1 Jun 2012, at 16:32, Stéphane Corlosquet wrote: >> >> > Hi Lewis and all, >> > >> > Just checking in on the possibility of using Niklas' RDFa 1.1 compliant >> > library [1] before the upcoming release of any23. Given that cli-rdfa >> > already passes all of the official RDFa 1.1 tests, this ought to solve >> > all >> > the current issues in the custom RDFa parser that any23 currently uses. >> > See >> > [2] for an example. >> >> Missed that post; just saw Lewis's followup. >> >> Are you in contact with the author? I don't see a License that would >> permit its inclusion in an Apache project. Though its presence at >> github suggests the author would probably be happy to see it reused!
Absolutely! Both the core clj-rdfa library and clj-rdfa-jena are licensed under the Eclipse Public License (the same as Clojure). I hope that's compatible with the Apache license? If not I'll gladly change it (to e.g. MIT), albeit since it requires Clojure to run I suspect its license has to be compatible anyway for this to fly.. (I'm not a lawyer, but AFAIK EPL and APL are compatible at least insofar as EPL-licensed code is allowed to be dynamically linked to by APL code. I'm less certain about derivative works, there seem be some patent-related differences.) I already had a license statement (in the README.md) for clj-rdfa [1], which I just now also added to clj-rdfa-jena [2]. Best regards, Niklas [1]: https://github.com/niklasl/clj-rdfa#license [2]: https://github.com/niklasl/clj-rdfa-jena#license
