er krishna wrote: > Can Anyone Please tell me the answer of following qustions : > > > 1) When we access AOE target device then while acessing it, is it > necessary to first unmount it from the server pc , and then use on > client nodes ? Why ? Does this prevent file system corruption or we > can do it without unmounting it.
Imagine your HD being connected to two IDE cables from 2 machines at once, then you'll understand > > 2) While using AOE on San with more than one client, which server ( > Kvblade, vblade, ggaoed or qoaed ) is more reliable based on > synchronization, speed and reliability ? no idea, kvblade is said to be quicker. I've never had any problems with sync or reliability with vblade. the code is *very* simple I've not used the others, just vblade on Linux / Plan 9 > > 3) While acessing the whole disk ( /dev/sda1 to /dev/sda5 ) from > target to client, shall we create its Raid array or we can use it five > differnt AOE devices. In which way it will be more faster and more > secure in terms of synchronization ? I don't see the point of RAIDing to the same disk, just means more CPU. I would say RAID the disks and serve one image via AoE. I have RAIDed with vblade for experimentation, I also served that to Windows and TruCrypted it just to see how much you could push it. My advice is for you to really think about what ATA over Ethernet means. ATA is a protocol. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM) software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to build responsive, highly engaging applications that combine the power of local resources and data with the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR SDK and Ajax docs to start building applications today-http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com _______________________________________________ Aoetools-discuss mailing list Aoetools-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aoetools-discuss
