On Mar 16, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Ed Cashin wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 01:04:53AM -0800, Matthew Ingersoll wrote: > ... > I would rather avoid introducing new parts of the source that aren't > comfortable for folks using 80-character editors. >
I overlooked this since I was pressed for time and wasn't using my usual editor - I'll fix it. > I am in a bit of a hurry, so sorry if I am missing something obvious, > but why does the user need to supply an interface explicitly when the > "-i" flag is in use? Normally you start a vblade process by specifying an interface as argv[3] (minus getops) vbladed 0 0 eth0 /path/to/file So I wanted to keep that style and any extra interfaces to use could be specified with the "-i" option vbladed -i eth1 0 0 eth0 /path/to/file or vbladed -i eth1 -i eth2 0 0 eth0 /path/to/file I haven't really given it that much thought other than keeping the argv/getop parsing/changes down to a minimum. It could be modified to change the argv index after getop to assign the parameters correctly minus the "netif" parameter and possibly to comma separate the "-i" list like the "-m" option. The current way works fine for me but feel free to suggest or modify. -- Matth Ingersoll ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Aoetools-discuss mailing list Aoetools-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aoetools-discuss
