On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 06:08:57PM +0100, Nicolas Jungers spake thusly:
> The target uses a cheap NIC, that's why the payload isn't better, and 
> both servers are connected back to back, but I had the same result with 
> a cheap switch.

To try to isolate the issue I would try to devise some sort of network test
such as running a dd of /dev/urandom over netcat for a few gigs from one
machine to another and doing an md5sum sum on the data to see if there was any
corruption in the network independent of AoE/filesystem etc.

For what it's worth, I have never had an AoE data corruption problem.

-- 
Tracy Reed
http://tracyreed.org
Digital signature attached for your safety.

Attachment: pgplMmO1Jj31V.pgp
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________
Aoetools-discuss mailing list
Aoetools-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aoetools-discuss

Reply via email to