On 2011-12-29 20:12, Tracy Reed wrote: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 06:08:57PM +0100, Nicolas Jungers spake thusly: >> The target uses a cheap NIC, that's why the payload isn't better, and >> both servers are connected back to back, but I had the same result with >> a cheap switch. > > To try to isolate the issue I would try to devise some sort of network test > such as running a dd of /dev/urandom over netcat for a few gigs from one > machine to another and doing an md5sum sum on the data to see if there was any > corruption in the network independent of AoE/filesystem etc. > > For what it's worth, I have never had an AoE data corruption problem. >
It is definitively a NIC problem. I'm one server NIC to short for my test and I started them with a realtek. They doesn't handle jumbo frame that well. N. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox _______________________________________________ Aoetools-discuss mailing list Aoetools-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aoetools-discuss
