On Sep 26, 2012, at 12:03 PM, Jeff Rogers <dv...@diphi.com> wrote: > Daniël Mantione wrote: > >> IPV6, please, please, please! >> >> Seriously, lack of IPV6 support is the perfect excuse to phase out an >> AOLServer installation. >> >> Depending on how long it will take to produce 4.6, maybe even consider a >> 4.5 series release with ipv6, I have noticed any instabilities of my >> patch at least. >> >> My patch: http://www.freepascal.org/~daniel/aolserver-ipv6support.diff > > Definitely a good idea; I'll add it to the list (which I'll put up on > the wiki sometime soon). > > I'm not well versed in pv6, but one concern I have about your patch is > that it looks like it changes everything to support only ipv6, with ipv4 > in compatibility "mapped" mode. Could that break compatibility for some > older systems? Do we care?
YES! :-) > > -J > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > How fast is your code? > 3 out of 4 devs don\\\'t know how their code performs in production. > Find out how slow your code is with AppDynamics Lite. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219672;13503038;z? > http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html > _______________________________________________ > aolserver-talk mailing list > aolserver-talk@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aolserver-talk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How fast is your code? 3 out of 4 devs don\\\'t know how their code performs in production. Find out how slow your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219672;13503038;z? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ aolserver-talk mailing list aolserver-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aolserver-talk
