Ayan George wrote: > Can we: > > * Allow c99 language features.
This might impact platform support, or that might be a non-issue. Any specifics on what you're looking for? > * Fully support HTTP 1.1 I thought about this but without digging in I couldn't recall which pieces are missing (other than chunked encoding). > * Support configuring multiple servers using namespaces in the > configuration file? Sounds interesting, can you be more specific? Maybe create a sample config file showing what you'd like to work. > As far as development goes, can we move to git as the main way to > maintain code and adopt more modern ways of submitting patches? This is a tough one. Dossy created a github project a year or two ago, but it hasn't seen a lot of use. The development center is currently on sourceforge, and migrating a project is a big effort not to be taken lightly. Some of us are also old farts and not very skilled with git and/or turned off by the intense debates over its merits. My current feeling on this is that there are not enough active developers right now to make cvs really problematic. An influx of interest and contributors would change this, but I'd prefer to defer the big job of repository changing until it looks more necessary. -J ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How fast is your code? 3 out of 4 devs don\\\'t know how their code performs in production. Find out how slow your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219672;13503038;z? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ aolserver-talk mailing list aolserver-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aolserver-talk
