On Thursday, September 20, 2001, at 12:40 PM, Jerry Asher wrote:

> So while you are certainly distributing that 2-3 second per interp startup
> cost over time, you aren't eliminating it.
>
[snip]
> I'm not saying what you guys want to do is wrong in any manner, I'm just
> trying to understand how AOLserver works and what applications rl_proc
> will
> be useful for.

Your analysis seems spot-on to me.  I just thought this would be a quick
hack to see if the tcl scripts are the culprit.  Even starting multiple
threads at starting, you'll still take a hit if you have to crank up
another thread during the life of the process.  I'm just trying to get a
handle on likely avenues of attack for solutions.  Starting up a thread
should be more heavyweight than forking a CGI, so I'm trying to get a
handle on whether thread startup is heavy, and how, if at all, it can be
mitigated.

Reply via email to