On Thursday 20 September 2001 11:01 am, Peter M. Jansson wrote:
> On Thursday, September 20, 2001, at 10:53 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > to stick with 2.3.3 here look more attractive....  Of course, 2.3.3
> > had/has
> > its own problems, but this one is not one of them.

> If you run one or two web nsds per machine, you'll definitely win with
> AOLserver 3 or 4 -- it just works better, has fewer bugs, and Kriston won'
> t yell at you for using obsolete software.

In my current circumstance, I'd be running multiple nsd's under 3.x. A single
2.3.3 nsd handles, oh, about 15 IP addresses here, for our hosted sites as
well as our internal sites.  We're not large enough to dedicate

Due to the many changes from 2.3.3->3.0, 2.3.3 cannot fairly be called
obsolete, as it is still useful for many.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

Reply via email to