Actually, there is a subtle difference here - source "filename" is not the same as a typical include.
With a typical include, the effect is the same as if the file were include at that point. A "return" statement executed in a sourced file means to stop sourcing the file at that point and continue executing after the source statement in the calling proc. That is not the same effect as if the file were included. Jim > > On 2001.09.27, Jerry Asher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Since AOLserver 3.3 came out, I've been thinking that an > > > > ns_include <filename> > > > > command might be very handy in this situation. > > What would be the difference between [source filename] and > [ns_include filename]? > > > Still I am sorry to say that I believe AOLs response to the bug reports was > > more typical of the old AOLserver attitude towards the community than what > > I was hoping was a friendlier attitude that I had been seeing. > > I do agree that it was probably a bad idea for them to break the > feature in the 3.x tree -- minor releases should be backwards > compatible. Breaking it in the 4.0 release would have been > perfectly acceptable, IMHO. > > Still, it's done. Start picking up the pieces, and get on with > life. ;-) > > -- Dossy > > -- > Dossy Shiobara mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Panoptic Computer Network web: http://www.panoptic.com/ >
