Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:

On Friday 06 June 2003 09:50, you wrote:


>At the risk of adding complexity to the parent process, I >wouldn't mind seeing such a monitoring facility added to the >parent process.


That implies, the parent (watchdog) should have at least one thread with the instantiated Tcl interp with ns_* command set loaded, right? We can put some ns/server/watchdog section and fill in some variables there, one of whoch could point to a file with Tcl procs to run for checking.

Sort of that, hm... ?

Zoran

Not necessarily. Maybe. It would be nice to be able to use Tcl to communicate and implement parent process modules and functions.

But maybe it's simpler and more reliable just to put in a bare
bones http get implementation


Jerry



-- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list: http://www.aolserver.com/listserv.html List information and options: http://listserv.aol.com/

Reply via email to