On Saturday 31 May 2003 20:03, Tom Jackson wrote:
> Andrew Piskorski wrote:
> >Zoran, I disagree.

> Me too! It sounds like a more native way of controlling the process. I
> can't count the number of cases of reported failure to properly install
> and setup daemontools to work.

Zoran, if votes count, I vote that your patch be integrated (possibly as a
configure option.  --with-controller-process or something).  I like this
simple, easy, native method that doesn't require any other work.  Nice.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list: http://www.aolserver.com/listserv.html
List information and options: http://listserv.aol.com/

Reply via email to