On Saturday 07 June 2003 09:59 am, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: > On Friday 06 June 2003 17:35, Don Baccus wrote: > > Right, if you skip the traces you don't get the module-defined ns_* > > commands, we're on the same page here ... as far as this bit goes anyway. > > After thinking again and again, I see two possible scenarios. > One thing upfront: I'd like to have *both* of the ns_eval behaviours > available: the older one (as in 3.x) and the new " interp sync" mode. > This is my target.
I agree ... > Well, either of those will lead to solution. The second option > allows for more flexibility. The first is simpler to implement. > > Thoughts? I don't have strong feelings either way. Synching of the state of all interpreters is something that won't be done often and requires great care in how you write the rest of your application so I don't think we need the command to be particularly aesthetic, elegant etc. The second approach is more flexible so is attractive but I don't think there's a lot of demand for the extra functionality. Then again if you implement it the masses may suddenly start wondering how they ever lived without it in earlier versions of AOLserver! Who knows? :) -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list: http://www.aolserver.com/listserv.html List information and options: http://listserv.aol.com/
