Don Baccus wrote:

I would love to have time to contribute to AOLserver

It sounds like you just contributed 4 hours tracking down a bug.

Yes, that's my thinking, too.  An "ns_sync" tthat copies state and "ns_eval"
that works as it did in AOLserver3 would probably both be useful.



how about:
ns_interp sync
ns_interp eval ?

--Tom Jackson


-- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list: http://www.aolserver.com/listserv.html List information and options: http://listserv.aol.com/

Reply via email to