Wait, I thought mashups were simply http requests from javascript to update 
parts of a web page. You return either javascript, html or an xml document, 
which is probably a worthless option. 

Maybe I got this wrong, but AOLserver should be able to step into a mashup 
instantly. 

tom jackson


On Monday 05 May 2008 12:37, Jeff Rogers wrote:
> The hottest fun free apps currently are mashups and social networking
> things.  And all the data providers (i.e., facebook, flickr, twitter,
> etc) have php and java client libraries (and occasionally a few others).
>   I don't think any of them have aoslerver/tcl libraries.  That is
> needed as an entrypoint.
>
> One starting point I'd be willing to help on here is an openid client
> (since I've already started work on it).
>
> The more traditional personal apps - news/content pages, blog/message
> board, etc - are still useful too.  (and would be a reason for having an
> openid server also :)   Prior to Dossy's call to action on this, I was
> thinking about starting just such a project for my own use (under the
> working name ASblog - A Simple blog, or AolServer blog, then expanding
> it to A Simple Site, but ASS site doesn't seem so catchy).  OpenACS is
> out there; it's a great system but it's a big system, not really the
> ideal introduction.
>
> There's another problem too - "free".  Or at least, cheap.  Not
> aolserver or the apps themselves, but a place to run them.  There are
> lots of places where you can get php hosting for $5 a month (which
> includes a bunch of stuff preinstalled, email, etc...).  If you want to
> host aolserver, the cheapest option I'm aware of is an unmanaged linux
> vps for around $15/mo and *then* you need to set up everything yourself.
> (and depending on the vps you might have memory issues)  I guess this is
> just part of that chicken and egg problem.  Maybe just call it /bin/sh
> (the "shell" of the egg... get it?)
>
> Somewhat related to this last point is my current interest (and
> frustration) in helping out small non-profits.  I'd like to help out
> some local groups (preschools, clubs) set up websites for things like
> fund-raising, school supplies wishlists, news, and so forth;  I'd like
> to use the best technology available as a foundation (imho, aolserver
> meets that criteria) but the hosting costs make it unattractive - the
> difference between $60 a year and $180 a year (labor costs are donated
> of course) is significant at this level.   (I vaguely recall a story of
> Philip Greenspun pitching aolserver/acs to some nonprofit with zero
> software cost being a big selling point and being rebuffed because in
> their multi-million dollar budget was already allocated plenty for
> building completely new systems from scratch.  This is a different
> league I'm talking about.  The entire IT budget is maybe a few hundred
> dollars and most of that probably goes for printer ink.)
>
> Which brings me back to something I've mentioned before, shared hosting.
>   AOLserver can do virtual hosts, but a little more framework would be
> needed to realistically serve multiple independent sites from a single
> installation.  Nothing huge or insurmountable, just some isolation
> between separate servers so someone doesn't accidentally (or
> maliciously) overwrite someone else's data.   Two quickies come to mind:
>   'ns_db gethandle' should not be able to get a handle from a different
> virtual server (I don't know if it can now), and there should be a way
> to run a safe interpreter and pass commands like 'open' to a setuid
> ns_proxy.  The 3.x era nsvhr/nsunix modules let you run an entire server
> as a different user, but that would be even more memory-prohibitive.
> (Before someone says "just use apache, it does all this well" my point
> is that I don't want to use apache, I want to use aolserver because it's
> better for applications, and if it's worse for addressable
> practicalities when I'd like to address those practicalities and make it
> better.)
>
>
> -J
>
>
> --
> AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
>
> To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the
> email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: 
field of your email blank.

Reply via email to