Hello! On Thursday 26 March 2009 21:40:05 Dossy Shiobara wrote: > I wonder - should this be the documented known behavior of ns_adp_abort > vs. ns_adp_return? i.e., abort indicates that the connection is > intentionally terminated, not logged, etc. vs. ns_adp_return which halts > ADP processing but continues the connection, which includes logging, etc. > > I'm inclined to agree with you that the current behavior is a bug, but > it raises the question: should there be such a function that says "this > connection wasn't handled, don't even log it" - or, should ALL > connections always be logged, even if it's aborted?
How about ADP or file is included into ADP with code ns_return 200 {text/html; charset=utf-8} {some message} ns_adp_abort or ns_returnfile 200 [ns_guesstype $fname] $fname ns_adp_abort This request _must be_ logged. ns_adp_break is not correct here because it will send all output to closed connection. Best regards. -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <lists...@listserv.aol.com> with the body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.