Jade Rubick wrote:
Unless we hear otherwise, so far I think we can summarize this thread as:
Tom strongly dislikes github.
Several other people favor it.
The rest don't care or haven't spoken up yet.
I'll toss in my 2 cents. For my recent projects I've begun to use
fossil. It has a distributed wiki and bug tracker in addition to
distributed source control. The command set is very simple, much
simpler than git. There is no equivalent of github for fossil, but it
doesn't need one; fossil includes its own web interface that runs as a
cgi. The big win of fossil is that installation is simple; it's one
executable that includes everything (command line tools, client, server,
...), and it works the same on unix and win32.
It's not for everyone, but I highly suggest taking a look at it. And I
wouldn't mind if aolserver started using it :) (I've been meaning to
set up my own aolserver fossil repo, but I keep not finding the time to
do so.)
http://fossil-scm.org/
-J
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to
<[email protected]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject:
field of your email blank.
