If I had to choose between Fossil and stone tablets, I would choose stone tablets. Fossil lives up to its name.
tom jackson On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Jeff Rogers <[email protected]> wrote: > Jade Rubick wrote: > >> Unless we hear otherwise, so far I think we can summarize this thread as: >> >> Tom strongly dislikes github. >> Several other people favor it. >> The rest don't care or haven't spoken up yet. > > I'll toss in my 2 cents. For my recent projects I've begun to use fossil. > It has a distributed wiki and bug tracker in addition to distributed source > control. The command set is very simple, much simpler than git. There is > no equivalent of github for fossil, but it doesn't need one; fossil includes > its own web interface that runs as a cgi. The big win of fossil is that > installation is simple; it's one executable that includes everything > (command line tools, client, server, ...), and it works the same on unix and > win32. > > It's not for everyone, but I highly suggest taking a look at it. And I > wouldn't mind if aolserver started using it :) (I've been meaning to set up > my own aolserver fossil repo, but I keep not finding the time to do so.) > > http://fossil-scm.org/ > > -J > > > -- > AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ > > To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to > <[email protected]> with the > body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: > field of your email blank. > -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[email protected]> with the body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
