Lars and Dean, Thanks for your messages concerning our lanneg proposition. It's a pity this feature can't make it into the release.
Is it possible a record of our request be kept open so that it be considered in forthcoming releases? We think that having a default language feature is a fast way to introduce I18N into web servers which have a large legacy document base. Best regards, -Jose Kahan, on behalf of the w3c web team In our previous episode, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > Synopsis: Suggestion: Default language for LanNeg > > State-Changed-From-To: closed-suspended > State-Changed-By: dgaudet > State-Changed-When: Tue Sep 30 10:16:50 PDT 1997 > State-Changed-Why: > Actually we don't support what he's asking for -- the ability > to set the language for a file that doesn't have a language > extension. LanguagePriority is used to set the priority for a > request that doesn't include an Accept-Language header. > > 1.2 is in feature freeze, and 1.3 has just entered it because > we're beginning a beta cycle. So it'll have to wait for now.
