The following reply was made to PR general/1180; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dean Gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: general/1180: Suggestion: Default language for LanNeg Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 12:20:30 -0700 (PDT) You that's why it's marked suspended and not closed... but I can understand your confusion with GNATS' rather cryptic output below. FWIW, it'd be really trivial to write a module to do this. It doesn't necessarily have to be part of the standard distribution. Dean On Tue, 14 Oct 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Lars and Dean, > > Thanks for your messages concerning our lanneg proposition. > It's a pity this feature can't make it into the release. > > Is it possible a record of our request be kept open so that it be > considered in forthcoming releases? > > We think that having a default language feature is a fast way to > introduce I18N into web servers which have a large legacy document base. > > Best regards, > > -Jose Kahan, on behalf of the w3c web team > > In our previous episode, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > > Synopsis: Suggestion: Default language for LanNeg > > > > State-Changed-From-To: closed-suspended > > State-Changed-By: dgaudet > > State-Changed-When: Tue Sep 30 10:16:50 PDT 1997 > > State-Changed-Why: > > Actually we don't support what he's asking for -- the ability > > to set the language for a file that doesn't have a language > > extension. LanguagePriority is used to set the priority for a > > request that doesn't include an Accept-Language header. > > > > 1.2 is in feature freeze, and 1.3 has just entered it because > > we're beginning a beta cycle. So it'll have to wait for now. >
