>Number: 2296 >Category: os-qnx >Synopsis: SERIALIZED_ACCEPT on QNX >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: apache >State: open >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: apache >Arrival-Date: Wed May 27 08:50:01 PDT 1998 >Last-Modified: >Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Organization: apache >Release: 1.3b7 >Environment: >Description: There is no form of SERIALIZED_ACCEPT defined for QNX.
USE_FLOCK_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT and USE_FCNTL_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT both seem to work fine. Admittedly, I can't create much of a load. I suspect some form of SERIALIZED_ACCEPT would be better than none. Based on the reading it seems USE_FLOCK_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT is the better choice. If there is some way of conclusively determining appropriate functioning or for determining which is better/faster, please let me know. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: Here's a diff -c for conf.h... *** conf-orig.h Mon May 11 15:59:01 1998 --- conf.h Wed May 27 11:43:08 1998 *************** *** 626,631 **** --- 626,632 ---- #include <unix.h> #define HAVE_MMAP 1 #define USE_POSIX_SCOREBOARD + #define USE_FLOCK_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT #define HAVE_SYSLOG 1 #elif defined(LYNXOS) >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] >uname -a QNX 23 G 424 PCI 32 Watcom 10.6
