The following reply was made to PR os-windows/4124; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Doug Wyatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: os-windows/4124: can't handle "./" in SSI; removing the "./" gets around the problem Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 13:59:45 -0600 Yes, "#include virtual ./motd" works, as one would expect. I see that the mod_include doc recommends 'virtual' over 'file'. Could you point me to web docs which more fully explain SSI than does the mod_include doc with Apache? Specifically, any Standards documentation? And more particularly, why 'virtual' is preferred over 'file'? Regards, Doug > Date sent: 25 Mar 1999 21:50:46 -0000 > To: apache-bugdb@apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL > PROTECTED] > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: os-windows/4124: can't handle "./" in SSI; removing > the "./" gets around the problem > [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] > [you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ] > [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] > [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] > [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] > [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ] > [from a developer. ] > [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ] > > > Synopsis: can't handle "./" in SSI; removing the "./" gets around the problem > > Comment-Added-By: coar > Comment-Added-When: Thu Mar 25 13:50:43 PST 1999 > Comment-Added: > > Please try using "include virtual" instead of "include file" > and see if the problem goes away. > >
