coar 98/01/14 08:41:36
Modified: . STATUS
Log:
Add update on the status of the great commit/review debate.
Revision Changes Path
1.91 +8 -7 apachen/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===================================================================
RCS file: /export/home/cvs/apachen/STATUS,v
retrieving revision 1.90
retrieving revision 1.91
diff -u -r1.90 -r1.91
--- STATUS 1998/01/14 15:38:38 1.90
+++ STATUS 1998/01/14 16:41:34 1.91
@@ -169,21 +169,22 @@
Ken says he'll try to maintain it, since there are
people/places who need it
+ * The decision has been made to experiment with allowing code
+ changes to be committed without prior review. Specific guidelines
+ and implementation date to be worked out.
+
Open issues:
+ * Guidelines for when prior review is required if commit-then-review
+ is the normal mode of operation. Roy has started covering the
+ whole process in <http://dev.apache.org/guidelines.html>.
+
* Ken's [POLL] apachen/patches directory
Shall we experiment with allowing patches to be distributed for
voting through cvs, by creating a directory under the source tree
and putting them there? Please vote.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status: Ken +1, Randy 0, Dean 0, Jim +1, Paul 0
-
- * Ken's [POLL] experiment with commit-then-review
- Shall we permit unreviewed commits to the source tree? (Details
- of when it's [in]appropriate to be worked out later.) Vote, please.
- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Status: Ken +1, Randy +1, Ben +1, Martin +1, Dean +1, Brian +1,
- Jim +1, Rob +1, Paul 0, Ralf +1
* Paul would like to see a 'gdbm' option because he uses
it a lot. Dean notes that 'gdbm' include 'db' support
