Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > Rich Bowen wrote: > > > > First, although the copious comments are wonderful for the beginner, > > they are excessive for someone moderately experienced. There needs > > to be an abridged version of the config file with minimal comments. > > > > Second, the file is arranged a little randomly, and could stand to be > > arranged in a somewhat more coherent manner. > > This one I'll dispute a bit. I and others invested a considerable > amount of time arranging the file to reduce randomness. It's possible > that it can be improved still more, but it is *not* random as it > stands.
No offense intended. It's just a complaint that I've heard. Perhaps a TOC would be useful to disperse the perception of randomness. Personally, having worked with the file for a few years, I have a pretty good idea of where everything is, and it seems to make sense to me. > Next point: futzing with the httpd.conf file is straying rather a > bit from the 'documentation' aspect of this project. Before > going down this path too far, I recommend involving the new-httpd > development list in the discussion. Ah. Good point. If I ever get around to having time to actually work on this, I'll make sure to mention it there. :wq -- Author: Apache Server Unleashed - www.apacheunleashed.com Director of Web Application Development - http://www.cre8tivegroup.com/
