On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Rich Bowen wrote: > Joshua Slive wrote: > > - Cleaning. > > - We could use a list of all the docs that can be axed out of 2.0 > > because they are redundant or irrelevant. > > I've been noticing some of these lately. I'm reluctant to bring them up, > because they tend to be cases where there are two very good docs on the > same subject, and people might get their toes stepped on if we were to > choose one and not the other. But, I'll try to be diplomatic. I need to > look these up again.
Please fire away. If they were my docs, then I can take it as well as I can give it. > > I wonder if we should have a doc like this committed to each > > repository so that we can keep track of things that need > > to be done (like the STATUS file in the source distribution). > > Yes, that would be very helpful. Or, alternatively, these things could > be logged in the bug tracking system. > I'll start up a STATUS file in 2.0 with this stuff in it. The bug tracking system is in no state to be useful for this kind of thing. Joshua.
