Joshua Slive wrote: > > My opinion is that we should just leave this as-is in 1.3. 1.3 is in > "maintenance mode" at the moment, so major changes are strongly > discouraged.
Au contraire. It is in maintenance mode only because everyone's attention has shifted to 2.0. If there is a commmunity desirous of continuing to work on 1.3 -- which is going to be out there for a looooong time yet -- it is welcome to do so. However, it nowadays carries the additional burden of committing to bringing any changes forward into 2.0 -- having fixes or features in 1.3 that are not also in 2.0 will not be allowed. > We have kind of ignored that restrictions for docs, since so > much work needs to be done. However, moving around man pages > would involve changes in the config system, and we probably don't > want to do that. I do not think the STATUS item refers to moving them, but to getting their HTML representation into the HTML docco tree. Which can be done as an addition w/o requiring any breakage to existing stuff. It would not be good to *move* them, but *adding* the HTMLised man pages would be good. In any event, someone with energy to work on the docco stuff is always welcome. I will pursue getting Jason commit access. I have been remiss in this area lately; is there anyone else who should get commit access at this point who does not yet have it? Jason, remember that you need to test things locally before committing; checking in broken stuff is a no-no. And things about which you are not certain, which you suspect might be controversial, need to be floated on this list first. -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Apache Software Foundation http://www.apache.org/ "Apache Server for Dummies" http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Apache Server Unleashed" http://ApacheUnleashed.Com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
