On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > I do not think the STATUS item refers to moving them, but to > getting their HTML representation into the HTML docco tree. > Which can be done as an addition w/o requiring any breakage to > existing stuff. It would not be good to *move* them, but *adding* > the HTMLised man pages would be good.
Actually, the HTML versions are already there, which is why I assumed that this STATUS item referred to the troff versions. Perhaps we have hit the source of the original confusion here. I am in full agreement with the rest of what you wrote. Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
