On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Be very careful that the Body: tag matches the ending tag. The > commit of my mod_negotiation patch included diagnostics. We will only > parse 8k bytes, all these files were smaller than 1k. > > Does this look good to everyone? Very fast, very compact, very > consistent.
Forgive me if I missed part of this conversation... I'm only about 30% done reading the 1100+ emails I missed last week. I like it, except for a few nits with the Body: thing. (1), why no space after the : and before the separator? Granted, we're not making a *real* header, but it just looks funny and is inconsistent. (2), why in Content-type and Content-language are the 't' and 'l' lower-case? (3), why not use multipart/alternative syntax rather than inventing our own? Something like the following. Thoughts? --Cliff ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------foo" ------------foo Content-Type: text/html Content-Language: en blah blah blah ------------foo Content-Type: text/html Content-Language: es bleh bleh bleh ------------foo ---------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
