On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:

> OK, try this on for size:
>

Looks good.

A couple little points: The thing I quoted was the HTTP spec, not the MIME
spec.  Also, I would probably refer to them as HTTP headers rather than
MIME headers.

If I was to write the same thing, I would have made one big section called
"File Meta-data" (or similar) and placed it above the
"multiple-extensions" section.  Then I would have started by (briefly)
discussing "Content-Type" as a subsection, followed by each of your
sub-sections.

Just an idea; it may or may not be better than what you have.
Feel free to commit what you've got.

Joshua.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to