On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote: > > > On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > OK, try this on for size: > > > > Looks good. > > A couple little points: The thing I quoted was the HTTP spec, not the MIME > spec. Also, I would probably refer to them as HTTP headers rather than > MIME headers. > > If I was to write the same thing, I would have made one big section called > "File Meta-data" (or similar) and placed it above the > "multiple-extensions" section. Then I would have started by (briefly) > discussing "Content-Type" as a subsection, followed by each of your > sub-sections. > > Just an idea; it may or may not be better than what you have. > Feel free to commit what you've got.
It's a good idea. I'll commit what I have, and then move in the direction of what you suggest, perhaps tonight. -- Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rcbowen.com/kenya/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
