On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > From: "Rich Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:05 AM > > > > On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > > > > - XHTML conversion > > > Status: unknown > > > > I was wondering about this. A few weeks ago I submitted some mod docs > > that had been xhtml-ized via w3c tidy. Did anyone have any complaints > > with those? If not, I can xhtml-ize the entire documentation tree in > > about a minute. > > +1, just do it. Give everyone fair warning (say Saturday evening/US > afternoon/EU) so they can get work-in-progress committed. After such > changes, it's very hard to fix version conflicts. > > We get several bonuses, not the least of which is finally folding all > tags to lower case, which is better for character and token-based > compression, and more consistent docs are easier to maintain.
ok, WARNING, I will be doing this Saturday afternoon, during my daughter's nap. -- Pilgrim, how you journey on the road you chose To find out where the winds die and where the stories go --Pilgrim (Enya - A Day Without Rain) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
