On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:

> On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> > From: "Rich Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:05 AM
> >
> >
> > > On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> > >
> > > > - XHTML conversion
> > > >         Status: unknown
> > >
> > > I was wondering about this. A few weeks ago I submitted some mod docs
> > > that had been xhtml-ized via w3c tidy. Did anyone have any complaints
> > > with those? If not, I can xhtml-ize the entire documentation tree in
> > > about a minute.
> >
> > +1, just do it.  Give everyone fair warning (say Saturday evening/US
> > afternoon/EU) so they can get work-in-progress committed.  After such
> > changes, it's very hard to fix version conflicts.
> >
> > We get several bonuses, not the least of which is finally folding all
> > tags to lower case, which is better for character and token-based
> > compression, and more consistent docs are easier to maintain.
>
> ok, WARNING, I will be doing this Saturday afternoon, during my
> daughter's nap.

Completed. See my other note. Thanks.

-- 
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author - Apache Server Unleashed - http://www.apacheunleashed.com/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to