I have two servers running ES and FP extensions from RTR and don't seem to have this problem.. My RPS's are:
redhat-config-httpd-1.1.0-4 httpd-2.0.46-32.ent httpd-devel-2.0.46-32.ent Is this different then what you are running. Whne does this ereror come up? Joel > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Joshua Levitsky > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 11:15 PM > To: Apache Frontpage support list > Subject: Re: [Apache-FP] apr_bucket_read() failed error > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bryan Field-Elliot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 10:52 PM > Subject: [Apache-FP] apr_bucket_read() failed error > > > > I've installed the RTR Frontpage extensions on my Apache > 2.0.46-26.ent > > (from RedHat Enterprise 3.0). I don't know what the relationship is > > between this mailing list and the RTR extensions. But this > much I do > > know, that the guys over there (at RTR) are f*ing morons, > and the people > > over here know what they're talking about. > > The failure of RTR to provide support was what got me > started with this > list. > > > I am having the same problem as shown here: > > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00048.html > > > > (The error is: (104)Connection reset by peer: > ap_content_length_filter: > > apr_bucket_read() failed) > > > > However, I run (and re-run) set_default_perms.sh, but I > still get the > > error. > > I had to go back and read my post but now I remember. It > wasn't until 2.0.47 > that a content length bug was fixed in Apache. I looked at > ftp://updates.redhat.com/ and it seems 2.0.46 is indeed the > latest for Red > Hat ES. If I was right about the bug then you need to go to > 2.0.47 or newer. > This isn't impossible. If you go to > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updat > es/1/i386/ you > can get 2.0.48 from there from the Fedora project which is > the basis for the > 3.0 Enterprise Server stuff. Assuming there's no special > bells and whistles > in the enterprise RPM for Apache then you should be a-ok > with cutting over > to the Fedora RPM, and then when the ES version of 2.0.49 or > whatever comes > out then you could jump back to the ES version if you wanted > by simply using > RPM to upgrade. > > I do hope this helps. If it does or doesn't please post back > here. I'm using > Fedora but I'd imagine some people reading the archive or on > the list are > using the Enterprise stuff. > > -Josh > > -- > Joshua Levitsky, MCSE, CISSP > System Engineer > Time Inc. Information Technology > [5957 F27C 9C71 E9A7 274A 0447 C9B9 75A4 9B41 D4D1] > > _______________________________________________ > Apache-FP mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.joshie.com/mailman/listinfo/apache-fp > > Donations: > http://www.amazon.com/paypage/PT5LZITM9L227 > _______________________________________________ Apache-FP mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.joshie.com/mailman/listinfo/apache-fp Donations: http://www.amazon.com/paypage/PT5LZITM9L227
