On May 30, 2012, at 16:56 , Steve Holden wrote:
> On May 30, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
>> For the talks, I would even propose to consider doing 30 minute instead of 
>> 50-60 minute talks. If structured well, a 30 minute talk can deliver a lot 
>> of information already. Downside might be that we need more budget this way 
>> (because we end up with more speakers) so that might not be practical!?
>> 
> This implies that there is a significant cost to adding speakers. I'd be 
> interested to know what you would expect these costs to be …

I am assuming that speakers get free access to the conference, which is what 
has been the case so far.

Greetings, Marcel

Reply via email to