On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Ross Gardler <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 21 June 2012 12:20, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please look at this: > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AgZqERZgbUeSdF9xcFdpNkp2UWNLUThxX3NYc1pZWnc#gid=0 > > > > line 4 tells me the track is named "openoffice" and the projects > > covered are Tika, POI etc > > Track title is poor, the description says ""If we consider a theme > such as 'Social Document & Content Technologies'', additional session > content may be scheduled from complementary Apache projects." > I beg to differ. Track Title = OpenOffice... formatting is poor since it was pushed to the bottom of the cell. > > > Probably a problem with the form? > > I don't think so, I think it's just a poor track title as a result of > This NOT the Track Title, this is an attempt to describe 'projects covered' which is the column header, and to reach out to complementary projects. > the OpenOffice community wanting to be more ASF inclusive. At least > that is my interpretation. > Yes, I am firstly focused on defining the OpenOffice Track as a grouping of sessions within which the concept is to organize (2) tracks: Technical and User. See the planning wiki.[1] [1] http://s.apache.org/4cp > > Ross > > > > -- > Ross Gardler (@rgardler) > Programme Leader (Open Development) > OpenDirective http://opendirective.com >
