On 21 June 2012 14:34, Donald Harbison <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Ross Gardler > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On 21 June 2012 12:20, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Please look at this: >> > >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AgZqERZgbUeSdF9xcFdpNkp2UWNLUThxX3NYc1pZWnc#gid=0 >> > >> > line 4 tells me the track is named "openoffice" and the projects >> > covered are Tika, POI etc >> >> Track title is poor, the description says ""If we consider a theme >> such as 'Social Document & Content Technologies'', additional session >> content may be scheduled from complementary Apache projects." >> > > I beg to differ. Track Title = OpenOffice... formatting is poor since it > was pushed to the bottom of the cell.
The original observation was "line 4 tells me the track is named "openoffice" and the projects covered are Tika, POI etc" and questioned whether there was an error in the formatting. The point I was trying to make is that if one person thought "why does an OpenOffice track have stuff on non-open office projects?" many others will. Therefore I conclude that "OpenOffice" as a track title is poor if the intention is to "consider a theme such as 'Social Document & Content Technolgies'" Of course, if the intent is to focus *only* on OpenOffice then it's a perfectly good track title and it;s the Projects Covered column that has bad data in it. It says 2 days in a 100 capacity room . Perhaps what you want is something like one day of OpenOffice and one day of "Social Document & Content Technologies"? Ross Ross
