On 12 Nov 2013, at 20:56, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > On 11/12/2013 03:49 PM, Tony Stevenson wrote: >> I hazard a guess that apachecon.eu has since expired, it seems to be in the >> locked state awaiting expiry. Do we really want to renew this if it has >> indeed expired? Or rather re-register it? > I really don't have an opinion on this. I seem to remember that someone > outside of the foundation registered it, and then signed it over to us (S&S > possibly?), but I could be making that up.
So unless anyone gets their collective panties in a twist I will drop the apachecon.eu domain from the radar. > >> Can we possibly agree on one standard? Is the site code sufficiently >> generic that we can make the site na11.apacheonc.com, work at >> www.apachecon.com/2011/na or something? So we support only one convention. > > Yes please. I'd prefer /year/VENUE personally, although > http://apachecon.com/2006/Asia/ is the one weird one that we could probably > leave as is. So I guess that makes my question more pertinent. Is the site sufficiently coded so that this will just work if I sort httpd config? Can comdev look at this and let me know, I will not progress anything until someone either instructs me to just get on with it, or confirms the code is ok. > Looks like we did in fact use that convention for the longest time. Looks > like it's NA rather than na, although we called it US rather than NA up > through 2010 > I am happy to use whatever convention I am told to use, but I’d like to have us support only one. We could use rewrite to capture the other known conventions to the supported one. > --Rich > >> >> >> >> >> On 12 Nov 2013, at 20:42, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: >> >>> Mostly I was just commenting that `whois apachecon.eu` doesn't actually >>> have any info in it, and that `dig apachecon.eu` doesn't return a record. >>> >>> I expect that what we want is to have apachecon.eu redirect to >>> http://apachecon.com/c/ and have the 2012 archive put there. Looks like >>> we've got a variety of different naming conventions for the various past >>> events listed there, including na11.apachecon.com and >>> apachecon.com/YEAR/VENUE and apachecon.com/euYEAR :( >>> >>> On 11/12/2013 03:23 PM, Melissa Warnkin wrote: >>>> Hey Tony, >>>> >>>> Thank you for your email. I'll have to defer to Rich and Nick to answer >>>> your questions. >>>> >>>> Rich/Nick: Please see Tony's questions below and let him know. >>>> >>>> Thank you all for your help!! >>>> >>>> ~M >>>> >>>> From: Tony Stevenson <t...@pc-tony.com> >>>> To: Apache Infrastructure - Private <infrastructure-priv...@apache.org>; >>>> Melissa Warnkin <missywarn...@yahoo.com> >>>> Cc: "apachecon-discuss@apache.org" <apachecon-discuss@apache.org> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 3:01 PM >>>> Subject: Re: Site is down or removed >>>> >>>> At what URL exactly would folks like the site published? >>>> The whois record for what zone is particularly unhelpful? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12 Nov 2013, at 18:06, Melissa Warnkin <missywarn...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello infra, >>>>> >>>>> Following up on this, as I haven't seen a request for your help yet. >>>>> >>>>> Please see below. Particularly: > I'm not sure who ended up with that >>>>> part of the concom responsibility >>>>>> when the board killed the committee, but whover that is may wish to >>>>>> ask infra nicely to put up a svn pubsub site based on that static >>>>>> archive at some suitable hostnames >>>>>> >>>>>> Nick >>>>> Perhaps it just expired. The whois record is unhelpful. can someone >>>>> follow up with folks from Infra to see what's up? >>>>> ============================================ >>>>> >>>>> Thank you so much!! Have a great day!! >>>>> >>>>> ~M >>>>> >>>>> From: Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> >>>>> To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 9:32 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: Site is down or removed >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 11/05/2013 08:56 PM, Nick Burch wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Rich Bowen wrote: >>>>>>> We do not, to my knowledge, still own that domain. >>>>>> You sure? We certainly used to, at least as late as May. When did >>>>>> someone transfer it away, and to who? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> A static version of the ApacheCon Europe 2012 site was captured into >>>>>> SVN after the event: >>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/apachecon/eu12.apachecon.com >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not sure who ended up with that part of the concom responsibility >>>>>> when the board killed the committee, but whover that is may wish to >>>>>> ask infra nicely to put up a svn pubsub site based on that static >>>>>> archive at some suitable hostnames >>>>>> >>>>>> Nick >>>>> Perhaps it just expired. The whois record is unhelpful. can someone >>>>> follow up with folks from Infra to see what's up? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Tony >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------- >>>> Tony Stevenson >>>> >>>> t...@pc-tony.com >>>> pct...@apache.org >>>> >>>> http://www.pc-tony.com >>>> >>>> GPG - 1024D/51047D66 >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Rich Bowen >>> >>> rbo...@rcbowen.com >>> http://rcbowen.com/ >> >> Cheers, >> Tony >> >> ---------------------------------- >> Tony Stevenson >> >> t...@pc-tony.com >> pct...@apache.org >> >> http://www.pc-tony.com >> >> GPG - 1024D/51047D66 >> ---------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > Rich Bowen > rbo...@rcbowen.com > http://rcbowen.com/ Cheers, Tony ---------------------------------- Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com pct...@apache.org http://www.pc-tony.com GPG - 1024D/51047D66 ----------------------------------
