Le 29/09/16 à 14:03, Rich Bowen a écrit : > > On 09/29/2016 04:25 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >> Le 29/09/16 à 09:55, Daniel Gruno a écrit : >>> I'll see if I can answer some of the critique here. >>> And I'll also note that critique - whether it be positive or negative - >>> is most welcome. >> I just want to know if there is a way to get the score for accepted talks ? > I'd really have to be persuaded that this is a good thing to do. The > talks that were scheduled, on the ApacheCon EU side, represent the top > 100 or so rated talks. So if it was scheduled, it scored > 0, and if it > wasn't, it didn't. Approximately. Sharing exact scores doesn't seem > like a lot of benefit to me, and, in the past, has led to heated, and > sometimes hateful, email to me about why a particular talk was scheduled > and another wasn't. > > So, no, I'm not keen on doing this. Perhaps you can persuade me > otherwise, but at the moment I see only negatives.
I get it, and I agree.
