Hey, You should try the mainstream version (git). A lot a leak has been fixed since the last official release.
Let me know if you experience the same issue after the update. Thanks. Anthony C. On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:42:44 -0800 (PST), Mariusz <[email protected]> wrote: > On the graph: "APED Restart" is a cron killing script ... > > On Nov 15, 9:37 pm, Mariusz <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> http://p.web-album.org/5f/9e/5f9e86e29e1612c2fcaa373b6ea02b25a,4,0.png >> Here is the graph from my munin's ape plugin. >> >> I pushing messages (~2500 msg/day, about 1KB each POST) to ape server >> (APE 1.0) via PHP [Curl] to my server-side command. I use only >> methods: >> Ape.config() >> Ape.getChannelByName() >> chan.pipe.sendRaw(); >> >> I think there is a big problem ... >> >> On Nov 15, 5:42 pm, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hey, >> >> > Are you experiencing the same issue ? >> > Can you provide an testcase and/or some informations about your >> > configuration (number of online user, etc...) >> >> > Thanks ;) >> >> > Anthony >> >> > On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 08:24:14 -0800 (PST), Doug Molineux >> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > I was wondering, if there was any progress on this issue? >> >> > > Thanks, >> > > Doug >> >> > > On Nov 9, 12:10 pm, <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> Hey, >> >> > >> I just finished my websocket benchmaker tools. >> > >> I connected 10k users, make them join a public channel. Everything >> > looks >> > >> good :/ Nomemoryleak. >> > >> I'll dig more again. >> >> > >> Btw, can you give me an IM address where we can talk ? >> >> > >> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:47:04 -0500, Felix Filozov >> > >> <[email protected]> >> > >> wrote: >> >> > >> > Here are the results of my tests >> > >> > Test 1 - Joins to private >> > >> > channel====================================12K >> > >> > joins within 5 minutes - 4% ofmemoryusage. >> > >> > Test 2 - Joins to public channel >> > >> > =====================================12K joins within 5 minutes - >> > >> > 45% >> > >> > of >> > >> >memoryusage. >> > >> > Clearly, joining a private channel consumes lessmemory. I reran >> > >> > Test >> > 1 >> > >> > again just to make sure, and the results were consistent. >> > >> > However, after both tests completed,memorywas not released. >> > >> > Throwing >> > >> > morememoryat it is not a problem, but restarting it could be an >> > issue. >> > >> > Hopefully these results help. >> > >> > - Felix >> > >> > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:30 PM, wrote: >> > >> > Ok, thanks for the informations. >> > >> > Can you please try the same test on a private channel ? (channel >> > with >> > >> > "*" >> > >> > as first character). >> >> > >> > With my benchmark I successfuly connected 30k users with about >> > >> > 150MB >> > >> > of >> > >> > memory. >> > >> > BTW I used a long polling transport (which is a lot more >> > >> > expensive >> > >> > than >> > >> > WebSocket). >> >> > >> > Let me write a websocket tools and run the same bench. >> >> > >> > I keep you in touch. >> >> > >> > On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 20:05:47 -0500, Felix Filozov >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> > > I only have access to the server side, and, using a JOIN hook, >> > >> > I >> > >> > > determined that there have been 9000+ JOINs within 5 minutes. >> > >> > > I'm pretty sure the browser receive a successful CHANNEL raw, >> > >> > because >> > >> > in >> > >> > > my previous tests that was the case. >> > >> > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:40 PM, wrote: >> > >> > > I see. >> >> > >> > > Do you have any rate of browser succesfully receiving the >> > >> > "CHANNEL" >> > >> > and >> > >> > > "JOIN" raws on joining ? >> >> > >> > > Thanks >> >> > >> > > Anthony >> >> > >> > > On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:22:14 -0500, Felix Filozov >> > >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > > I'm using BrowserMob to spawn thousands of browsers, with >> > >> > in 5 >> > >> > > minutes, >> > >> > > > that visit a URL. Each browser is open for at most 4 >> > >> > seconds. >> > >> > > Meaning, >> > >> > > > within 5 minutes there's many browsers opening and closing. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > The URL contains a Flex application, which connects to APE >> > >> > (jaeger >> > >> > > > branch) using a WebSocket. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > If you want, I can direct the traffic to you. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:58 PM, wrote: >> > >> > > > I've just tryed what you've said : >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > - Make 10k user Joining a public channel >> > >> > > > - ??? >> > >> > > > - Timeout for all user (leading to a LEFT for each user) >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Memoryconsuption is still about few MB on my machine. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > How do you run the bench ? >> > >> > > > Can you send me the tools/script you are using ? >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Thanks >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Anthony >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 13:11:37 -0500, Felix Filozov >> > >> > > > wrote: >> > >> > > > > I just ran a test of 9000+ joins (they joined for a few >> > >> > seconds >> > >> > > then >> > >> > > > > left) to APE within 5 minutes, and thememoryconsumption >> > >> > went up >> > >> > > to >> > >> > > > 38%. >> > >> > > > > It stayed there even after everybody left. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Felix Filozov wrote: >> > >> > > > > I had my units wrong. It's 2.4%, not 2.4MB. >> > >> > > > > I will do an exact test, where I only test connection >> > >> > attempts. I >> > >> > > > > believe this is where the leak occurs, because message >> > >> > > > > passing occurred infrequently during my previous tests. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:38 PM, wrote: >> > >> > > > > There are several reason where thememoryisn't restored >> > >> > back : >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > - Spidermonkey Garbage collector >> > >> > > > > - APE allocate a pool of socket for concurent users >> > >> > with a >> > >> > > "n*2" >> > >> > > > schema >> > >> > > > > : >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > Basememoryis 2 sockets slot : >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > - 2 users connect => nomemoryallocation >> > >> > > > > - 1 more user connects : Basememory* 2 (4 slot >> > >> > reserved) >> > >> > > > > - 2 more user connect (5 active users) => Basememory* 2 >> > >> > (8 >> > >> > > slot >> > >> > > > > reserved) >> > >> > > > > - And so forth. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > This scheme avoid APE to malloc/free too often. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > The fact is , does yourmemoryincrease because of >> > >> > message >> > >> > > sent, or >> > >> > > > > because of user connection (there is amemoryleak if >> > >> > your >> > >> > > 2.4MB >> > >> > > > was >> > >> > > > > caused >> > >> > > > > by the first). >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:20:32 -0400, Felix Filozov >> > >> > > > > wrote: >> > >> > > > > > I just tried the jaegerape branch, and the result is >> > >> > the >> > >> > > same. It >> > >> > > > > climbs >> > >> > > > > > to 2.4MB of usage, and stays there. >> > >> > > > > > I'll be more than willing to direct the traffic to >> > >> > one of >> > >> > > your >> > >> > > > > > installations. >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:17 PM, wrote: >> > >> > > > > > Hey, >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > Your APE is compiled using some compile optimization >> > >> > (-O2), >> > >> > > > leading >> > >> > > > > to >> > >> > > > > > some invalid valgrind output. >> > >> > > > > > BTW, can you please check if you still have the same >> > >> > > behaviour >> > >> > > > > using >> > >> > > > > > the >> > >> > > > > > "jaegerape" branch : >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > https://github.com/APE-Project/APE_Server/commits/jaegerape[3] >> > >> > > [3] [3] >> > >> > > > [4] [2] >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > Anthony >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:29:56 -0400, Felix Filozov >> > >> > > > > > wrote: >> > >> > > > > > > Here's some Valgrind output I captured >> > >> > > > >http://pastebin.com/uDcp43Xf[4] [4] [4] [5] >> > >> > > > > > [4] [1] >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Felix Filozov >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> > > > > > > I just used the Move demo to do a test on APE 1.0 >> > >> > and >> > >> > > APE >> > >> > > > Git >> > >> > > > > > (latest >> > >> > > > > > > APE in Git). >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > I had thousands of connection attempts to APE 1.0, >> > >> > and >> > >> > >memory >> > >> > > > > > increased >> > >> > > > > > > to 4MB and it stayed there even after all those >> > >> > > connections >> > >> > > > were >> > >> > > > > > broken. >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > Similarly, I had thousands of connection attempts >> > >> > to >> > >> > APE >> > >> > > Git, >> > >> > > > and >> > >> > > > > >memory >> > >> > > > > > > increased to 2MB and it stayed there as well. >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > I don't know ifmemoryis immediately deallocated, >> > >> > or >> > >> > > later >> > >> > > > on. >> > >> > > > > If >> > >> > > > > > the >> > >> > > > > > > former, it doesn't seem to work. >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Johnathan Leppert >> > >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > > > > > What version are you running? >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Ecrofom wrote: >> > >> > > > > > > I believe I'm experiencing the same thing. After >> > >> > about >> > >> > > 24 >> > >> > > > > hours, I >> > >> > > > > > > noticed ape was using over 300MB of ram. This >> > >> > didn't >> > >> > > happen >> > >> > > > > before >> > >> > > > > > but >> > >> > > > > > > I did change how I was using ape. >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > Before: The default standard setup as shown in >> > >> > the >> > >> > chat >> > >> > > > demo on >> > >> > > > > > your >> > >> > > > > > > site.Memoryusage was pretty much constant and >> > >> > low. >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> >> ... >> >> read more » -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "APE Project" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ape-project?hl=en --- APE Project (Ajax Push Engine) Official website : http://www.ape-project.org/ Git Hub : http://github.com/APE-Project/
