I was wondering, if there was any progress on this issue? Thanks, Doug
On Nov 9, 12:10 pm, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey, > > I just finished my websocket benchmaker tools. > I connected 10k users, make them join a public channel. Everything looks > good :/ Nomemoryleak. > I'll dig more again. > > Btw, can you give me an IM address where we can talk ? > > On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:47:04 -0500, Felix Filozov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Here are the results of my tests > > Test 1 - Joins to private channel====================================12K > > joins within 5 minutes - 4% ofmemoryusage. > > Test 2 - Joins to public channel > > =====================================12K joins within 5 minutes - 45% of > >memoryusage. > > Clearly, joining a private channel consumes lessmemory. I reran Test 1 > > again just to make sure, and the results were consistent. > > However, after both tests completed,memorywas not released. Throwing > > morememoryat it is not a problem, but restarting it could be an issue. > > Hopefully these results help. > > - Felix > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:30 PM, wrote: > > Ok, thanks for the informations. > > Can you please try the same test on a private channel ? (channel with > > "*" > > as first character). > > > With my benchmark I successfuly connected 30k users with about 150MB of > > memory. > > BTW I used a long polling transport (which is a lot more expensive than > > WebSocket). > > > Let me write a websocket tools and run the same bench. > > > I keep you in touch. > > > On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 20:05:47 -0500, Felix Filozov > > wrote: > > > I only have access to the server side, and, using a JOIN hook, I > > > determined that there have been 9000+ JOINs within 5 minutes. > > > I'm pretty sure the browser receive a successful CHANNEL raw, because > > in > > > my previous tests that was the case. > > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:40 PM, wrote: > > > I see. > > > > Do you have any rate of browser succesfully receiving the "CHANNEL" > > and > > > "JOIN" raws on joining ? > > > > Thanks > > > > Anthony > > > > On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:22:14 -0500, Felix Filozov > > > wrote: > > > > I'm using BrowserMob to spawn thousands of browsers, with in 5 > > > minutes, > > > > that visit a URL. Each browser is open for at most 4 seconds. > > > Meaning, > > > > within 5 minutes there's many browsers opening and closing. > > > > > > > > The URL contains a Flex application, which connects to APE > > (jaeger > > > > branch) using a WebSocket. > > > > > > > > If you want, I can direct the traffic to you. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:58 PM, wrote: > > > > I've just tryed what you've said : > > > > > > > > - Make 10k user Joining a public channel > > > > - ??? > > > > - Timeout for all user (leading to a LEFT for each user) > > > > > > > > Memoryconsuption is still about few MB on my machine. > > > > > > > > How do you run the bench ? > > > > Can you send me the tools/script you are using ? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Anthony > > > > > > > > On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 13:11:37 -0500, Felix Filozov > > > > wrote: > > > > > I just ran a test of 9000+ joins (they joined for a few > > seconds > > > then > > > > > left) to APE within 5 minutes, and thememoryconsumption > > went up > > > to > > > > 38%. > > > > > It stayed there even after everybody left. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Felix Filozov wrote: > > > > > I had my units wrong. It's 2.4%, not 2.4MB. > > > > > I will do an exact test, where I only test connection > > attempts. I > > > > > believe this is where the leak occurs, because message > > > > > passing occurred infrequently during my previous tests. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:38 PM, wrote: > > > > > There are several reason where thememoryisn't restored > > back : > > > > > > > > > > - Spidermonkey Garbage collector > > > > > - APE allocate a pool of socket for concurent users with a > > > "n*2" > > > > schema > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > Basememoryis 2 sockets slot : > > > > > > > > > > - 2 users connect => nomemoryallocation > > > > > - 1 more user connects : Basememory* 2 (4 slot reserved) > > > > > - 2 more user connect (5 active users) => Basememory* 2 > > (8 > > > slot > > > > > reserved) > > > > > - And so forth. > > > > > > > > > > This scheme avoid APE to malloc/free too often. > > > > > > > > > > The fact is , does yourmemoryincrease because of message > > > sent, or > > > > > because of user connection (there is amemoryleak if your > > > 2.4MB > > > > was > > > > > caused > > > > > by the first). > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:20:32 -0400, Felix Filozov > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > I just tried the jaegerape branch, and the result is the > > > same. It > > > > > climbs > > > > > > to 2.4MB of usage, and stays there. > > > > > > I'll be more than willing to direct the traffic to one of > > > your > > > > > > installations. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:17 PM, wrote: > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > > > > > Your APE is compiled using some compile optimization > > (-O2), > > > > leading > > > > > to > > > > > > some invalid valgrind output. > > > > > > BTW, can you please check if you still have the same > > > behaviour > > > > > using > > > > > > the > > > > > > "jaegerape" branch : > > > > > > > > https://github.com/APE-Project/APE_Server/commits/jaegerape[3] > > > [3] [3] > > > > [4] [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > Anthony > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:29:56 -0400, Felix Filozov > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Here's some Valgrind output I captured > > > > >http://pastebin.com/uDcp43Xf[4] [4] [4] [5] > > > > > > [4] [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Felix Filozov > > wrote: > > > > > > > I just used the Move demo to do a test on APE 1.0 > > and > > > APE > > > > Git > > > > > > (latest > > > > > > > APE in Git). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I had thousands of connection attempts to APE 1.0, > > and > > >memory > > > > > > increased > > > > > > > to 4MB and it stayed there even after all those > > > connections > > > > were > > > > > > broken. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Similarly, I had thousands of connection attempts to > > APE > > > Git, > > > > and > > > > > >memory > > > > > > > increased to 2MB and it stayed there as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know ifmemoryis immediately deallocated, or > > > later > > > > on. > > > > > If > > > > > > the > > > > > > > former, it doesn't seem to work. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Johnathan Leppert > > > wrote: > > > > > > > What version are you running? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Ecrofom wrote: > > > > > > > I believe I'm experiencing the same thing. After > > about > > > 24 > > > > > hours, I > > > > > > > noticed ape was using over 300MB of ram. This > > didn't > > > happen > > > > > before > > > > > > but > > > > > > > I did change how I was using ape. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Before: The default standard setup as shown in the > > chat > > > > demo on > > > > > > your > > > > > > > site.Memoryusage was pretty much constant and > > low. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently: I'm having chat messages sent via inline > > > push > > > > and > > > > > now > > > > > > see > > > > > > > memoryusage by ape keep on growing. I have about > > > 50-100 > > > > users > > > > > > online > > > > > > > at any time with about 100-200 messages being sent > > via > > > > inline > > > > > push > > > > > > > every minute. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dunno if this helps > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > You received this message because you are > > subscribed to > > > the > > > > > Google > > > > > > > Groups "APE Project" group. > > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > > > > [email protected] [5] [5] [5] [6] > > > > > > [5] [5] > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > > > [email protected] [6] [6] > > [6] [7] > > > [6] [6] > > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/ape-project?hl=en > > [7] [7] > > > [7] [8] > > > > [7] [7] > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > APE Project (Ajax Push Engine) > > > > > > > Official website :http://www.ape-project.org/[8] > > [8] [8] > > > [9] [8] > > > > [8] > > > > > > > Git Hub :http://github.com/APE-Project/[9] [9] > > [9] [10] > > > [9] [9] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > You received this message because you are > > subscribed to > > > the > > > > > Google > > > > > > > Groups "APE Project" group. > > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > > > > [email protected] [10] [10] [10] [11] > > > > > > [10] [10] > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > > > [email protected] [11] [11] > > [11] [12] > > > [11] > > > > [11] > > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/ape-project?hl=en > > [12] [12] > > > [12] [13] > > > > [12] [12] > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > APE Project (Ajax Push Engine) > > > > > > > Official website :http://www.ape-project.org/[13] > > [13] > > > [13] [14] > > > > [13] [13] > > > > > > > > > ... > > read more » -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "APE Project" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ape-project?hl=en --- APE Project (Ajax Push Engine) Official website : http://www.ape-project.org/ Git Hub : http://github.com/APE-Project/
