On 19 Dec 2010, at 20:57, Francis Tyers <[email protected]> wrote: > El dg 19 de 12 de 2010 a les 18:28 +0000, en/na Jimmy O'Regan va > escriure: >> On 19 Dec 2010, at 17:39, Francis Tyers <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> It would be nice to get this done before Christmas, are there any >>> comments ? >> >> It would probably be best to use a character other than '+'. In the >> event of the final part of the compound being analysed as a multword >> with inner inflection, the queue will be attached to the first part >> of >> the compound. As you're talking about a syntax change anyway, is >> there >> any reason to not insert the break directly? > > I guess we could use '~' and then change pretransfer.cc to output $^ > for > '~' instead of '$ ^' for '+'... > > Anything else ?
Well, having the differentiation would be generally useful, so it would be worth factoring it in aside from compounds. > This would need a small change in the tagger too. Can anyone think of a situation where it would need to be treated differently to normal def-mults? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lotusphere 2011 Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
