On 31 August 2011 10:11, Francis Tyers <[email protected]> wrote: > El dc 31 de 08 de 2011 a les 14:37 +0530, en/na amba kulkarni va > escriure: >> Thanks Fran. This is what I was also suspecting. >> >> Well, I would like to know about the performance -- if I split it into >> several dix files, and build more several bins out of it, run them >> serially to get the analysis, will the performance be of similar order >> compared to a single bin? > > This can't be done at the moment I think, because the analyser can't > accept input of LUs (^.../...$) for analysis -- although it would be an > interesting feature.
'Interesting' is subjective, but it would certainly not be difficult. It would be easier to just load multiple transducers from multiple files - lt-proc already combines multiple transducers from a single file, so it would just be a matter of file handling. Either would make a good GCI task. -- <Sefam> Are any of the mentors around? <jimregan> yes, they're the ones trolling you ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Special Offer -- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! And you'll get a free "Love Thy Logs" t-shirt when you download Logger. Secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsisghtdev2dev _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
