El dc 31 de 08 de 2011 a les 14:37 +0530, en/na amba kulkarni va escriure: > Thanks Fran. This is what I was also suspecting. > > Well, I would like to know about the performance -- if I split it into > several dix files, and build more several bins out of it, run them > serially to get the analysis, will the performance be of similar order > compared to a single bin?
This can't be done at the moment I think, because the analyser can't accept input of LUs (^.../...$) for analysis -- although it would be an interesting feature. > I have 4GB RAM, and I could get a single bin with lt-comp. The size > of this big bin file is 17M. > Recently I added some more data and then lt-expand stopped working. > But before that I had 117MB word forms, and still I have not covered > many issues in derivational morph. Do you have access to a machine with more RAM that you could test it on ? Regarding lt-expand, if the dictionary compiles, then you could just e.g. strip out the interesting lemmas that you want to expand. Or is there a reason you need to expand the whole thing ? Fran ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Special Offer -- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! And you'll get a free "Love Thy Logs" t-shirt when you download Logger. Secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsisghtdev2dev _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
