El dl 13 de 02 de 2012 a les 10:21 -0500, en/na Hector va escriure:
> Hi,
> going through the wiki I noticed this entry on a VM for transfer:
>
> http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/VM_for_transfer
>
> and these implementations:
>
> https://github.com/ggm/vm-for-transfer (Python)
> https://github.com/ggm/vm-for-transfer-cpp (C++)
>
> Now I have some questions about it: are these fully functional?
They are fully functional.
> are
> the Python and C++ implementations equivalent? how much faster is the
> VM approach compared to using apertium-{transfer, interchunk,
> postchunk}? Is the plan to have the Apertium pipeline use this VM
> approach instead?
The C++ version is about 4-5 times slower than the normal transfer :(
The idea is to move over to this eventually, but so far it does not
offer any performance improvements...
Fran
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
