On 14 February 2012 11:53, Jacob Nordfalk <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, the Java version is the fastest, 4 to 5 times faster than the C+ + > version for texts larger than a few hundred words. > The reason is that it is using Java bytecode for the transfer part. That > part is like 25 times faster. But rest is 2 times slower as its running > purely in Java and the Java code hasn't been fully optimized for speed. > A hybrid with java bytecode and the rest in C++ would run perhaps 10-15 > times faster than the current C++ version
Seems improbable - it's a pipeline, so it's only ever going to run as fast as its slowest part. -- <Sefam> Are any of the mentors around? <jimregan> yes, they're the ones trolling you ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
