Thank you for your response.

However, I don't think this is what I was looking for.

Let me put this in other words - I am creating a mini English-Polish translator 
(as an experiment for my MA thesis).

Therefore, I would like to be able to "publish" the system somehow, to present 
it to my supervisor or other students.

It is not very impressive, when you need to type complicated commands to 
translate a simple word, and that is why

i'm looking for a simple and basic "user interface".

Regards


W dniu 2012-04-04 18:25, Stephen Tigner pisze:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Bartias<[email protected]>  wrote:
>> Hello again
>>
>> I have a question - is there any easy way of creating a Windows
>> executable file from a system for a particular language file?
>>
>> I mean, is there any easier way to use a newly created system than via
>> Linux Terminal?
> There are instructions for compiling the c++ runtime under Visual C++
> on the wiki. (See:
> http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Apertium_on_Windows#Building_under_Visual_C.2B.2B)
> And from the introduction on that page. "Lttoolbox builds with Visual
> C++ without additional changes - provided that you follow the
> instructions in README.Win32."
>
> However, I haven't tried them myself, since I was comfortable using
> Cygwin, and also from that same page, "You will also need a Unix-type
> shell, such as bash, to run it. Batch files simply will not work, as
> Windows does not have true support for program pipes ('|').[1]. A
> solution can be using bash under Cygwin." And that footnote reads,
> "Rather than pipe directly between processes, the 'DOS box' uses
> temporary files to emulate it: ls|more becomes the equivalent of
> ls>tmp;more<tmp"
>
> tl;dr, best way to run the C++ runtime of Apertium on windows is using
> Cygwin. There is a windows installer that will help you install Cygwin
> with the appropriate dependencies. See
> http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Apertium_guide_for_Windows_users
>
> -- Stephen
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
> monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
> resolution app monitoring today. Free.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Apertium-stuff mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second 
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to